See the AI-native platform
built for solo & small firms
Registration is open for solo lawyers and small firms.
AI agents for law firms are software workers that carry out routine legal operations (client intake, scheduling, follow-ups, document filing, deadline tracking, billing prep) on their own, then hand each result to a lawyer for approval. Referent's AI agents run inside your firm's live matter context, so they act on your real clients and deadlines, never on a blank prompt, and every client-facing action waits for your sign-off.
Captures each inquiry, collects context, qualifies the lead, and turns it into a matter automatically. The pre-matter workflow runs itself, down to the proposal and payment link.
Routes incoming client correspondence to the right matter and drafts the replies you approve, so nothing sits unread and nothing leaves the firm without your sign-off.
Tracks hearings, meetings, and deadlines across matters and raises them before they bite, syncing both ways with your calendar.
Assembles the time, activity, and matter detail into billing-ready form, so the monthly scramble becomes a review instead of a reconstruction.
Run your practice by voice. Tell Referent what needs to happen and the agents do the legwork, instead of entering every client, matter, and task by hand.
Every agent works from your matter context and stages its result for review. Any client-facing or high-risk action requires your explicit approval, and every step is recorded.
An AI agent is not a smarter search box. It is software that owns a routine and runs it, start to finish, then hands the result to a lawyer. Inside a law firm, that means the work that used to fill the day between billable hours now moves on its own. The inquiry becomes a matter, the email lands in the right file, the follow-up goes out, the deadline gets tracked, the bill gets prepared. It is the layer that turns law firm automation software from a set of static rules into operations that carry themselves.
This matters most for the firms with the thinnest staffing. Solo and small practices bill only about three of every eight hours. The rest goes to the operational load agents are built to absorb.
The distinction that matters is agent vs. assistant. A legal AI assistant, a chatbot or a copilot, waits for you to ask, answers, and leaves you to copy the answer back into your systems. An agent already holds your firm’s live context and acts: it creates the record, files the document, sets the reminder, and stages the draft. One describes the next step. The other takes it, then asks you to approve.
Generic AI knows nothing about your firm. You paste context in and copy results out. Referent’s agents work from your firm’s live matter context: the clients, emails, documents, tasks, deadlines, and billing status already in your workspace. That context is the same one that powers Referent’s legal CRM, with leads, intake, clients, and matters in one place, so the agents act on records you already trust. Each agent owns one job and works from your real practice, not a blank prompt.
Ask “what needs my attention today?” and the answer comes from your actual matters. More importantly, the agents then do the work. They open the matter, draft the follow-up for approval, file the document, set the reminder, instead of just listing what you should do. That is what makes a firm AI-native: the software is the operating layer, not a tool you pick up and put down.
For a law firm, autonomy without control is a non-starter, so Referent’s agents don’t have it. The rule is constant: AI prepares, the lawyer approves. Any client-facing or high-risk action requires your explicit sign-off. Every action is recorded in an audit trail you can inspect. Every draft can be edited or rejected before it leaves the firm.
You trust the agents because of how they’re constrained, not because you’re asked to take them on faith. They remove the busywork and free up your time. The professional judgment, and the final decision, stays with the lawyer.
It’s worth being clear about category, because “legal AI” covers two different things. Tools like Harvey and CoCounsel are research and drafting assistants. They help a lawyer produce legal work product. Referent’s agents are operational. They run the firm: intake, matters, follow-ups, deadlines, billing prep. The two do different jobs, not rivals. If you’re comparing the research-tool category, we explain the difference in Harvey AI alternatives. If you’re weighing an assistive copilot against agentic operations, see Referent vs Clio Duo.
The difference
Most legal software stores your work and waits for you to do the next thing. An AI-native system does the routine work and asks you to approve it. Switch states to see what changes.
AI prepares; the lawyer approves at every step.
Most firms start by handing over the same handful of routines, prove the system on them, then widen the scope as trust builds:
None of this asks you to rebuild your practice or hand over judgment. With Referent, white-glove onboarding connects your email, calendar, and documents, so a firm reaches a working AI-native baseline in days. The payoff lands hardest where there’s the least back-office help. See how the agents fit solo law firm software for one-lawyer practices, or small law firm software for teams of two to ten.
A chatbot answers questions. AI agents run the operation, and keep every client-facing action behind a lawyer’s sign-off. That’s what Referent is built to do.
An AI agent for a law firm is software that owns a specific routine (intake, email routing, follow-ups, deadline tracking, or billing prep) and carries it out from your firm's live matter context, then stages the result for a lawyer to approve. Unlike a chatbot, it acts on your real clients and deadlines and moves the work forward on its own rather than waiting to be prompted each time.
A chatbot or copilot answers questions and drafts text when you ask it to. You still direct it turn by turn and re-enter the output into your systems. An AI agent already holds your firm's state and does the work: it creates the matter, files the email, sets the reminder, and prepares the bill, then asks you to approve. The difference is description versus action.
You trust them because of how they are constrained, not on faith. Referent's agents prepare and stage work but never take client-facing or high-risk action without a lawyer's explicit approval. Every action is recorded in an audit trail, and every draft can be edited or rejected before a word leaves your firm. AI does the legwork; the lawyer keeps the judgment.
No. They remove the repetitive operational load (data entry, filing, chasing, reminders) so lawyers and staff spend their time on client work and judgment. The goal is more capacity: the same team carries more matters, not a smaller team doing the same.
In Referent, voice is how you operate the firm hands-free: you tell it what needs to happen and the agents carry it out. Its intake also captures and qualifies inbound inquiries and turns them into matters. If what you need is a service that answers live phone calls like a receptionist, that is a dedicated category; Referent focuses on turning the inquiry into operations once it lands.
Referent starts free with no credit card and AI usage included, and you upgrade to paid plans as you grow, because the agents are part of an AI-native platform rather than a separate add-on. Standalone point tools price separately and still leave you to wire them into your practice management.
Registration is open for solo lawyers and small firms.